hit tracker <body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d23615820\x26blogName\x3dCenLamar:+A+Blog+on+Life+in+Alexandri...\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLACK\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://cenlamar.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://cenlamar.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d7276229209213654946', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Note to the Town Talk: You're Not a Blog (And You Shouldn't Try To Be One) I know, I know. I've given the Town Talk a hard time before. I've called them the Clown Talk. It was just a joke, guys. I promise. But their latest foray into the blogosphere has me scratching my head. Not because I fear the competition. (Because they're not really competing against anyone other than themselves. I don't blog for money, and neither does WeSawThat or Cenla Antics). The reason I'm confused by this StoryChat option is that it denigrates real journalism into a sounding board for anonymous posters. And that is not be the function of a newspaper; it is the function of a blog. Gannett, gentlemen, you can't just takeover the blog culture by manufacturing your own. I know, you're going to say, "Look kid, that's not what we're trying to do. We're just adding a feature for our readers and subscribers." "But to those of us who like our news delivered to us straight, without the commentary (leave that to editorials), allowing anonymous bloggers to comment on a story like "Natchitoches Marine Killed In Iraq" directly under the headline, it just doesn't sit well." "Well, we're not calling ourselves a blog," they'll claim. "It's a StoryChat function, and many other newspapers in similarly-sized markets have implemented the same technology with great success." "And how do you measure that success?" I'll ask. "Ad revenue," they'll say. "Exactly. If you can just take over our local blogosphere, you can make our active bloggers make you money. It's genius." As WeSawThat points out, this has been done in other Gannett-owned papers throughout Louisiana, and it seems to behave in a fairly predictable fashion. Every post appears as an anonymous one, unless the writer includes his or her name in the body of the text. Opinion letters and political stories get the most feedback, a rough facsimile of what we're doing here. To be honest, part of me thinks, "Either way, this could be fun. Like when they had Sound Off!" But Sound Off had its problems, remember? I have no doubt that this feature will be used, but in order for this to happen, the paper must relinquish some of its journalistic authority in the process. Blogs work best as an independent reaction to the news, not as a part of the news itself (unless it's an individual reporter's blog). Am I the only one skeptical of this? Here's an example of how this will function: From the Gannett-owned Battle Creek Enquirer. This is the disclaimer you must agree to if you want to participate in the Town Talk's blog:

While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should they see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. This forum system uses cookies to store information on your local computer. These cookies do not contain any of the information you have entered above; they serve only to improve your viewing pleasure. The e-mail address is used only for confirming your registration details and password (and for sending new passwords should you forget your current one). By clicking Register below you agree to be bound by these conditions.
I Agree to these terms and am over or exactly 13 years of age I Agree to these terms and am under 13 years of age I do not agree to these terms
If you're under the age of thirteen, we suggest the following: Go to www.hotmail.com, register for a new e-mail account, preferably something of local import like NedGee or MyronKaa, then return to this page, click on the "I Agree to these terms and am over or exactly 13 years of age" (13, incidentally, is the legal age you have to be in order to write stuff on the Internet), give them your fake e-mail address, and you're in business! Seriously, I don't know a blog that comes with so much legal mumbo jumbo. "That's why it's not a blog," you'll say. "It's StoryChat. I get it, I get it."